Comparison base from history
Choose whether to review against the full history or only selected sources.
This solution structures case files, identifies procedural references, processes new documents immediately against the existing history and creates a reliable basis for analysis, classification and subsequent drafting. A proceeding number can be stored or detected automatically for each file. Missing assignments, mixed files and critical procedural conflicts are flagged clearly and visibly.
Complete PIN validation first to activate analysis, upload and index functions.
Complete overview of all indexed documents with direct access to history, test area, manual mapping, transfer and deletion functions.
| Reference | Date | File | Scope | Primary | Weighting | Manual | Effective | Status | Action |
|---|
| Reference | Date | File | Scope | Primary | Weighting | Manual | Effective | Status | Action |
|---|
| Selection | Reference | Date | File | Scope | Primary | Weighting | Manual | Effective | Status | Action |
|---|
Configure the backend prompt, jurisdiction, review mode and source base from history and the test area. Define what counts as new material and whether the review should cover the entire history or only selected sources.
Choose whether to review against the full history or only selected sources.
Define what should currently form the test area for the analysis.
Status, focus document, history log and current files come together here. The document tables remain grouped in the Document index section.
The charts focus on urgent required actions, proceeding balance, test area issues, proceeding density and time gaps.
Graphical timeline with events, role heuristics, time gaps and per-point tooltips. The view separates by proceeding and visibly marks potentially relevant blocks.