GenAI / AI Solutions Architecture · Entrepreneurial · DACH · On an invoice basis

From GenAI to AI solutions architecture.

I step in when companies want more than pretty slides and lab toys: real use cases, clean target architecture, RAG and agent design, governance, security, cost control and an operating model that does not implode at the first edge case.

RAG · Agentic AI · LLMOps Governance · Security · Integrations Production instead of playground
Ziel GenAI with operational maturity
Hebel Use cases, architecture, data, guardrails, monitoring
Modell Entrepreneurial mandate on an invoice basis
You bring me in when it gets serious

Typical high-pressure GenAI situations

Not for pretty future pictures. For robust systems that have to fit into real processes.

01

Use cases exist, but the architecture is missing

A lot of vision, little system logic. I bring structure to data sources, retrieval, roles, guardrails and the operating model.

02

Pilots look good, but they do not scale

What shines in a demo flow often collapses in production because of access rights, cost, quality or governance. That is exactly where I step in.

03

AI gets bought, but not truly introduced

I connect use case, architecture, integrations, security and rollout so that productive adoption becomes viable at all.

What I bring into the mandate

Not just AI. System design.

Use cases with technical honesty

I sort out which use cases are viable, which data basis is missing and where security or governance set the real boundaries.

RAG, agents, tools, integrations

From architecture layers and tool calling through monitoring: not as a chain of buzzwords, but as a productive end-to-end design.

Operations, risk, cost control

AI becomes expensive and risky when operations only arrive at the end. I design runtime, guardrails and ownership in from the start.

In the mandate, concretely

What viable AI architecture looks like early on

The difference does not lie in a demo, but in turning AI topics into a robust system logic with an operational perspective.

Use cases lose the fog.
It becomes visible what has real value, which data basis is missing and what should not be forced into a pilot.

Architecture gains a clear edge.
RAG, agents, tools, roles and integrations are not thought about separately, but as one connected target design.

Operations are built in.
Guardrails, monitoring, ownership and cost control do not come at the end; they are built into the architecture from the beginning.

Adoption becomes more realistic.
Pilot, rollout and operational handover follow a technical and organisational line, not just hope.

Engagement model

With a real target architecture instead of a buzzword loop.

DACH · Remote · Hybrid · On site Pilot, build-up, stabilisation
Direct contact

If GenAI has to move from the lab into real operations and clear ownership, let us talk.

Direct contact with Roman Mayr. No intermediary layer, no diluted architecture communication. Email directly at info@x25lab.com.